“You mormons are ignoramuses” – Orson F. Whitney

Today’s piece of Bullshit comes from Apostle Orson F. Whitney written in the 1972 Ensign.

The quote in question is as follows:

“Many years ago a learned man, a member of the Roman Catholic Church, came to Utah and spoke from the stand of the Salt Lake Tabernacle. I became well-acquanted with him, and we conversed freely and frankly. A great scholar, with perhaps a dozen languages at his tongue’s end, he seemed to know all about theology, law, literature, science and philosophy. One day he said to me: ‘You Mormons are all ignoramuses. You don’t even know the strength of your own position. It is so strong that there is only one other tenable in the whole Christian world, and that is the position of the Catholic Church. The issue is between Catholicism and Mormonism. If we are right, your are wrong; if you are right, we are wrong; and that’s all there is to it. The Protestants haven’t a leg to stand on. For, if we are wrong, they are wrong with us, since they were a part of us and went out from us; while if we are right, they are apostates whom we cut off long ago. If we have apostolic succession from St. Peter, as we claim, there is no need of Joseph Smith and Mormonism; but if we have not that succession, then such a man as Joseph Smith was necessary, and Mormonism’s attitude is the only consistent one. It is either the perpetuation of the gospel from ancient times, or the restoration of the gospel in latter days.”

Now for a minute we should go along with this story.  Never mind that the Catholic “learned man” (A derogatory term in Mormon scripture) ignores atheism, buddhism, Islam, making up by far the majority of beliefs of individuals living at the time on the planet. It ignores the possibility of thor, zues, and any number of other gods recorded in history.

It’s a statement of hubris.  It evaluates the protestant faiths not by their claims (That God directly calls man, and no hand-off of priesthood is required), but by the catholic point of view.  Imagine if a protestant learned man spoke to Orson F. and said “You mormons are ignoramuses it is either your or the protestants” and then gave a discussion about how faith and works and that we are incapable of coming before god based on works.  It would totally dis on Catholics without considering their view point.

In fact, humor me, imagine that a member of the islam faith spoke to Orson F. and said something like “You mormons are ignoramuses it is either your or islam” because no one else has the truth of plural wives or restored prophets.  Someone actually said this to me on my mission, not an exact quote, but pretty close.

What you end up with is that mormons simply must be ignoramuses, because they sure look like an amalgamation of all the faiths present at the time Joseph was a live.  Any individual religion can claim “We and the mormons” have something in common, but that should set off alarm bells in the person hearing it’s head.  Orson should have thought something like “This man is trying to flatter me” instead of “What a true statement, I’m going to share that with my entire church.

Now some further issues with the statement:

Orson F. doesn’t cite a source.  In fact, we have no idea if he really had the conversation at all.  This is the same as someone else saying “Hey a pastafarian said it was either Atheism, or them that have it right, so I totally believe in wearing pirate clothing now, and so should you”.  No credibility to the source or the story.

It ignores the other Restoration faiths that came out of the burned over district.  It is carefully crafted to make the audience “mormons” feel special while giving no specifics beyong the shocking term “ignoramuses”, which is clearly dropped for effect to make the listener sit up and listen, start to get upset, and then… oh right, I’m special.

This is a sort of bullying tactic, where the LDS are making themselves feel better by “putting down” other faiths.  And even though it paints catholics as the “other possibility” even catholics are not flattered by the story.

But even worse, the arguement is a poor one

Let alone the offshoots of mormonism, from the FLDS, to the Bickertonites, to the Strangites.  Comparing mormonism to catholicism for “unbroken lines of succession” seems pretty weak. At best Orson’s friend was unfamiliar of how poor Brigham’s claim to succession really was as well as that his own church doesn’t claim apostolic succession (A pope need not be an apostle).

No catholic learned man ever backed up the story

In all the years this story has been told and retold (I heard it in seminary) not a single catholic has stood up to state “I knew Orson F. I said that statement, let me clarify a few things…”.   Which puts this story pretty much in the Paul H. Dunn category of credibility.

Not really likely anyone ever said such a thing.  Not likely that any Catholic would be convinced of such a statement.  Probably crafted as a faith-promoting sales pitch to help the already converted.  And anyone who will buy a line like that without doing research… is probably an ignoramus.

This entry was posted in GA Bullsh*t. Bookmark the permalink. Last edited by Mithryn on September 22, 2013 at 4:48 pm

7 Responses to “You mormons are ignoramuses” – Orson F. Whitney

  1. God is no longer a true or faults question. God is a cultural question. Each of us was conditioned from the cradle to the beliefs of our parents. Beyond perception no one knows from nothing, If you believe in a Catholic God that is your cultural value. It’s truth begins with you and ends with you. Beyond you perception of your God God does not exist.

    • Frankie T says:

      Or perhaps you don’t exist beyond the holodeck created by God, the stage upon which you perform.
      Quantum science & metaphysics offer so many more possibilities than these measily few. I seem to recall the term “infinite” bandied about.

      • Mithryn says:

        I actually think we might be on a holodeck. But in that case it is incumbent to prove that the “God of the Holodeck” is a good one and worthy of worship, rather than he is just tormenting us for his (her/its) amusement

  2. FHL says:

    I remember hearing this story at Institute. What I remember is that it was used to bolster the authority of the priesthood. Either it came down the line through the Catholics all the way from Jesus, or it got restored in modern days by John the Baptist. At the time, I doubt I considered how absurd either proposition was.

    I believe this would be called a faith promoting rumor. =)

  3. John D says:

    I too was troubled by the absence of a traceable source–until I realized that the argument doesn’t require documentation. It stands (or falls) on its own merits. So let’s not lean on that crutch in an effort to discredit the argument. Of course it’s possible to pose counterarguments, but none of the above (even though they too have merit) is sufficient to discredit it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *